← HERA v2.0 work plan

Milestone 01 · Deliverables v1

Diagnostic & Strategy Brief

What the current site costs the firm, the structure that replaces it, and the three decisions that unblock milestone 02.

Delivered
Aug 14, 2026Week 2, day 1
Decisions needed
3All on today's agenda
Blocks
Milestone 02Wireframe count and hero copy
Content owed
6 itemsBy HERA, through Sep 4

Deliverable 01Digital diagnostic

Twenty-three findings from the August 10 capture. The full report is on file — this is the part that carries a decision.

The bottleneck

Credibility rests entirely on one biography. Remove Dr. Peguero's bio and nothing verifiable is left on the site.

No capital deployed, no deal count, no founding year, no entry dates, no case studies, no press. The portfolio — the section that should prove the firm can invest — is four silent logos. Everything else in the report is downstream of that.

Where the 23 findings land

GroupFindingsFixable on the live site nowResolved by the rebuildNeeds HERA content
Credibility11524
Structure and search615—
Technical615—
Total237124

Four findings are not ours to close. Portfolio detail, verifiable figures, the full executive roster, and any signal that the firm is active this quarter are content only HERA holds. No amount of design substitutes for them.

Content inventoryWordsShare
Team21431.5%
Portfolio71.0%
Home page, total679100%
Technical baselineTodayGo-live
Indexable pages29+
Images with alt text0 of 20All
Session duration~30s90s

One decision on the live site

Decision · this week

Does herainvesting.com stay live for the next seven weeks, or go to a holding page?

The site currently opens with “Notice: Rebrand underway. Some site features may be affected.”, carries three visible typos, publishes a Gmail address and the wrong company address, and has an Under Construction page in its own sitemap. That is what a qualified reader meets until October 2.

Keep it live, cleanedSix fixes, under an hour each: kill the banner, unpublish the Under Construction page, correct three typos, move to a domain email, publish the Houston address. Five of the six are HERA's to execute. Keeps brand search intact.
Hold page until go-liveOne screen: wordmark, one line, one contact route. Removes every credibility defect at once and buys silence for seven weeks. Costs the existing indexation and any inbound arriving today.

Deliverable 02Sitemap and content map

The structure that replaces the single page, and the words it needs to fill.

Decision · today

Four vertical pages at the top level — healthcare, energy, real estate, alternative businesses.

Today one URL carries seven topics, so nothing can rank for “waste to energy investment” or “oncology clinic investment.” Four top-level pages stay inside scope — only third-level subpages are excluded — and the home page keeps its single guided scroll. They are a go only if HERA's team has the bandwidth to write them. Each needs a thesis paragraph and a set of investment criteria that do not exist today; the focus-area bullets already do. Four pages of placeholder copy would cost more credibility than the pages gain.

Proposed sitemap

/                            Home — one guided scroll, reverse pyramid
├── /healthcare/             Conditional on content bandwidth
├── /energy/                 Conditional on content bandwidth
├── /real-estate/            Conditional on content bandwidth
├── /alternative-businesses/ Conditional on content bandwidth
├── /journal/                Index — CMS collection, latest first
│     └── /journal/{slug}/   Post — CMS entry
├── /privacy-policy/         Legal — migrated, effective date refreshed
└── /cookie-policy/          Legal — migrated

Removed: /under-construction/  →  301 to /

Home page content map

Nine sections, top to bottom · 100% see section 1, ~15% reach section 7
#SectionJob it doesWordsStatus
1HeroWhat HERA does, who it helps, why now — in one screen30–45Blocked — decision 01
2Proof stripThree or four figures that make the claim checkable15–25Blocked — decision 02
3What HERA doesThe four verticals, scannable, each linking to its page140–180Draftable now
4Why HERAThe four pillars, rewritten in an operator's voice120–150Draftable now
5PortfolioReal entries that demonstrate the firm can invest150–200Blocked — HERA content
6TeamOperator credibility, stated as the differentiator200–260Partial — 2 of the roster written
7JournalEvidence the firm is active this quarterDynamicNeeds a cadence commitment
8ContactThe one action the whole page pushes toward40–60Blocked — decision 03
9FooterLegal entity, disclaimer, policies, correct address60–80Draftable now
TotalAgainst 679 words today755–1,0004 of 9 blocked

CMS collections

CollectionRequired fields
Portfolio entryBrand, sector, region, entry year, description, HERA's role, logo, alt text, link. An entry cannot be saved without sector, entry year, and role — this is where the portfolio problem gets fixed permanently.
Team memberName, role, shared title, belief statement, bio, portrait, alt text
Journal postTitle, slug, date, author, summary, body, hero image, alt text
VerticalName, slug, thesis, focus areas, investment criteria — only if the vertical pages are approved

Content HERA owes

ItemNeeded byBlocks
Answers to the three open decisionsToday, Aug 14Hero, proof strip, contact design
Go / no-go on the four vertical pagesToday, Aug 14Sitemap sign-off, wireframe count
Portfolio detail for all five brandsFri, Aug 21Portfolio section, CMS schema
Full executive roster, bios, belief statementsFri, Aug 21Team section, Person schema
Thesis and investment criteria per verticalFri, Aug 28Vertical pages, wireframes
Journal publishing cadenceFri, Sep 4Journal section

Deliverable 03SEO target-keyword map

Twenty-three terms drawn from HERA's own vocabulary, not a generic finance list — the specific language is the only language the firm can credibly win. The acceptance criterion asks for five.

Where these land

Six terms have a home today. Fifteen wait on the vertical pages. Two wait on the journal.

One indexable URL is carrying seven topics, so every non-brand term below is competing against the firm's own home page. The keyword map and the vertical-pages decision are one argument — approve the pages and fifteen of these get somewhere to rank; decline, and the map collapses to the six brand and positioning terms.

Target keywords

P1 first · target URL is where the term is meant to be won
KeywordIntentTarget URLStatus todayP
hera investingNavigational/Ranking — brand, held1
real economy investment firmCommercial/In the meta description, but no page is about it1
operator-led investment firmCommercial/Not addressed — and it is the whole differentiator1
oncology clinic investmentCommercial/healthcare/Not addressed1
oncology platform investorsCommercial/healthcare/Not addressed1
clinical research site investmentCommercial/healthcare/Not addressed — strongest credential match on the site1
waste to energy investmentCommercial/energy/One bullet on the home page1
waste to energy project financeCommercial/energy/Not addressed1
offtake-backed project financeInformational/energy/Not addressed — precise, low competition, already HERA's word1
clinical facility real estate investmentCommercial/real-estate/Not addressed — bridges two verticals, nobody is claiming it1
what operators look for in an investment partnerInformational/journal/No journal exists — this is HERA's argument, as a post1
hera pw ltdNavigational/Appears only in the footer disclaimer2
long-term investment partner for operatorsCommercial/Not addressed2
operator-first governanceInformational/A pillar heading with nothing behind it2
precision oncology investmentCommercial/healthcare/Appears once, as a bullet2
healthcare infrastructure private investmentCommercial/healthcare/Not addressed2
latam healthcare investment partnerCommercial/healthcare/Three of four portfolio brands are Mexican, and it is never stated2
industrial solar investment partnerCommercial/energy/Not addressed2
cross-border joint venture mexicoCommercial/alternative-businesses/Matches the actual portfolio2
how offtake-backed project finance worksInformational/journal/No journal exists2
regional energy cluster investmentCommercial/energy/Not addressed3
destination hospitality real estate investorsCommercial/real-estate/Not addressed3
income-producing real assets investmentCommercial/real-estate/Not addressed3
23 terms11 at P16 URLs22 of 23 unaddressed today

Deliberately not targeted

Term familyWhy not
“best investment firm”, “top investment company”Superlatives. The brand is not arrogant, and the traffic is comparison shoppers HERA cannot convert.
“high return investments”, “investment returns”The voice counts the work, not the money. No returns claim appears anywhere in the product.
“how to invest”, “investment for beginners”Retail intent. Wrong reader entirely.
“private equity firm”Adjacent, but it flattens the operator-led positioning into the category HERA is trying not to sit in.
Spanish-language termsEnglish only this engagement. Worth revisiting after launch, given the LATAM portfolio.

Two caveats, both worth stating out loud. No search volumes or rank positions appear above — Search Console is not connected, and inventing numbers would be worse than publishing none; priorities here are judgment, and they get re-ranked against real impressions the day access is shared. And the technical floor has to be built first: one H1 per page carrying its target term, alt text enforced at the CMS, hand-authored Organization and Person schema, a generated sitemap.xml with /under-construction/ 301'd, and Core Web Vitals passing on mobile.

NextWhat we need back

Three decisions. All three change work that starts today.